{"id":3287,"date":"2025-03-08T19:40:47","date_gmt":"2025-03-08T11:40:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.constructionlaw.tku.edu.tw\/?page_id=3287"},"modified":"2025-08-16T07:46:14","modified_gmt":"2025-08-15T23:46:14","slug":"home","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.constructionlaw.tku.edu.tw\/en\/home\/","title":{"rendered":"Construction Technical Appraisal"},"content":{"rendered":"

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””][\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1746503120326{margin-top: 40px !important;}”][vc_column width=”1\/4″][vc_single_image image=”7433″ img_size=”200×200″ alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_circle” css=””][\/vc_column][vc_column width=”1\/2″][vc_column_text css=””]The Research and Development Center of Construction Law (CLC) brings together leading experts to provide professional legal and technical advice to courts, arbitration associations, mediation commissions, technical appraisal bodies, and engineering-related institutions.<\/p>\n

Chairman of the Construction Technical Appraisal Committee:
\nDr. Chien-Chung (John) Li<\/a>
\nFormer Chairman, CECI Engineering Consultants, Inc.
\nFormer Vice Chairman, Public Construction Commission
\nFormer Dean, College of Civil Engineering, National Central University<\/p>\n

Chairman of the Legal Advisory Committee:
\nDr. Hwang Li<\/a>
\nFormer Dean, College of Law, National Chengchi University<\/p>\n

Center Director:
\nProf. Su-Ling Fan<\/a>
\nDepartment of Civil Engineering, Tamkang University[\/vc_column_text][vc_tta_accordion active_section=”99″ collapsible_all=”true”][vc_tta_section title=”Services” tab_id=”1743034141084-0ab68138-8981″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

I. Construction Technology Accreditation<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Accepting courts or government orders and provide profession opinion entrusted from clients. Including: Controversy on project\u2019s agreement (Extension in construction period, confirmations of price, geological variations etc.), analysis and distribution of responsibility on engineering disaster, analysis on liability on adjacent property damage, analysis on disaster for insurance claim etc.<\/p>\n

II. Expert\u2019s Opinion<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Accepting entrustment from government or non-governmental to provide expert\u2019s opinion. Including: Controversy on project\u2019s agreement (Extension in construction period, confirmations of price, geological variations etc.), analysis and distribution of responsibility on engineering disaster, analysis of liability on adjacent property damage, analysis of disaster for insurance claim etc.<\/p>\n

I<\/strong>I<\/strong>I. <\/strong>Consulting Services<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Assist in construction projects, including but not limited to schedule management, cost management, quality management, procurement management, risk management, and other project management and contract performance management matters. Additionally, provide consulting services on construction dispute matters to one of the disputing parties or other stakeholders involved.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”Operation Procedure” tab_id=”1743034141091-d68a2c05-cf57″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

I.Procedure Review<\/strong><\/h4>\n

To determine the acceptance of the case and evaluation of the fees. Prejudging team will be formed according to the type of case and notify the client to make payment in one week through email notification. Client will be urged to make payment. The entrustment from courts or clients will be rejected if payment does not received from client.<\/p>\n

II.Substantive Review<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Prejudging team is responsible to read through the case. In case prejudging team found that they have to clarify the fact, they must inform the clients and ask them to prepare evidences or call for a meeting. Formation of prejudging team is based on technical accreditation mechanism. After the initial report is done, it will be reviewed in committee meeting.
\nReview meeting classifies into project committee meeting and committee meeting. Type of meeting is decided depend on number of field related while the rest is according to technology accreditation mechanism.<\/p>\n

III.Committee Meeting \uff08Project Committee Meeting\uff09<\/strong><\/h4>\n

After committee reach a consensus that the accreditation result is correct, our centre will send our expert\u2019s opinion to the courts or clients, in the name of Tamkang University Construction Law Research and Development Centre.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”Accreditation Mechanism” tab_id=”1743034191441-36ca7a5f-1942″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

I. Construction Technology Accreditation\u2019s Mining Committee System<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Various engineering field recruit committee members who are expert, with high reputation and experienced to form the committee. No tenure system on committee members. Committee can recruit members who reach the requirement at any time. However, whoever injustice and do not comply with professional ethics will be driven out from the committee.<\/p>\n

II.A prejudging team must be formed to handle all jobs or cases accepted by accreditation committee.<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Prejudging are subjected to review procedure before making the final conclusion.<\/p>\n

III. Prejudging Procedure<\/strong><\/h4>\n

Committees of prejudging team of construction law consultancy and cases of accreditation are selected by director. Director will assign committees who have professional skills on the related field.
\nCommittee members of prejudging team of construction technology accreditation is different and it is depend on type of the case.<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Basic type: Cases which only relate to only one field and with simple legal relationship. Prejudging team: The post will be run by professional assigned by the director of the construction technology accreditation committee.<\/li>\n
  2. Compound type: Involve more than two professional field. Prejudging team: The post will be run by professional assigned by the director of the construction technology accreditation committee and expert from the related field must be invited.<\/li>\n
  3. Integrate type: Cases which relate to interface between more than two professional field-construction and the legal relationship is complicated. Prejudging team: The post will be run by professional assigned by the director of the construction technology accreditation committee and committee must at least have knowledge on project management and committee with knowledge of law might be included if it is needed.<\/li>\n
  4. Combine type: Cases which related to large scale construction and development project, MRT project, engineering dispute cases that cross border and cross stage. Prejudging team: The post will be run by professional assigned by the director of the construction technology accreditation committee or expect who have knowledge on project management and law.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Review team will make decision based on voices from prejudging team if any controversial happened between prejudging team.<\/p>\n

    IV. Review Procedure<\/strong><\/h4>\n

    Project committee handle the review work. Project committee is made up of director, director of construction accreditation committee, director of law consultancy committee and committee from other related field.
    \nCommittee must attend project committee\u2019s meeting and it is non representative.
    \nProject committee\u2019s meeting practise principle of consensus. Principally, \u00bd out of all committee must attend the meeting and it require agreement from 2\/3 of the committee.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”Operating Principle” tab_id=”1743034222098-9c024d68-f41c”][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

    I. Operating Principle<\/strong><\/h4>\n
      \n
    1. Justice in appraisal: All committee from prejudging and review team must follow article 303 and article 32, which is voluntarily disqualify himself\/herself in circumstances as mentioned in paragraph 1 to 5 of code of civil procedure.<\/li>\n
    2. Objectivity principle in appraisal: Do not publish name list of prejudging team. Members of prejudging team and the expert are not allowed to contact with client privately.<\/li>\n
    3. Principle of specialization: deliberation of opinion between members and senior members of committee must be done for the work in same field. If the members do not specialise in that particular field, they must recruit experienced expert to handle the case.<\/li>\n
    4. Confidentiality principle: The report only can be provided to client. During the process, committees and whoever participate the investigation are not allowed to provide materials and opinions to other. No reference material and evidence of the accreditation can be taken out and everything must be returned to clients within one week after the accreditation has been done.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      II.Prejudging Procedure<\/strong><\/h4>\n
        \n
      1. Litigants and litigious participant should take an active approach to provide evidences which is beneficial to themselves<\/li>\n
      2. Field survey will be conducted when it is needed. When the survey is done, client will be together.<\/li>\n
      3. Cases are examined through written review. When necessary, meeting or audio and video conference is called to present the opinion after get agreement from client.<\/li>\n
      4. Client is contacted and asked to provide evidences at once time when the evidence is insufficient. If the evidences needed are not provided after 6 months, the accreditation will be ended and the fees will be refunded after deducting 20% of the operating cost.<\/li>\n
      5. Sampling, experimenting, drilling, measuring etc. during accreditation process should be entrusted helps from other agent. Our centre will contact suitable organisation to carry out the process. The process will be carried out under supervision of our centre and authorised organization. The cost is afforded by client.<\/li>\n
      6. Before validating the report, both parties involved in the controversy and interested parties should be given chances to present or reinforce the evidence.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        III.Review Procedure<\/strong><\/h4>\n
          \n
        1. Director calls for committee meeting to handle review work. Director will authorise a committee to represent him\/her when he\/she is not able to attend the meeting.<\/li>\n
        2. Related organisation or expert is invited when needed after committee meeting evaluate the case.<\/li>\n
        3. Appraisal opinion is rejected and prejudging team will amend it if the opinion cannot get 2\/3 agreement from the committee who attend the meeting<\/li>\n
        4. Committee or senior committee who is assigned to attend to court to explain the appraisal opinion should attend the committee meeting; committee and expert that involve in the work should sit in meeting to explain the accreditation procedure.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          IV. Appraisal Report<\/strong><\/h4>\n
            \n
          1. Principally, accreditation cases those accepted by our centre will be dealt within 3 months. Processing period can be extended after it is approved by director when it is necessary. The processing period is stopped if it has to wait for certificate or other entrusted agent to drilling, testing and measuring.<\/li>\n
          2. According to article 340 in code of civil procedure, the designated officer of our centre will attend to court to explain the appraisal opinion.<\/li>\n
          3. Litigants or other interested parties have to request for clarification if there is any queries on the appraisal opinion. Fees will be charged if item other than original entrustment is asked for evaluation.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

            [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”Accreditation committee” tab_id=”1743034266097-5af56edd-f941″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

            Director<\/strong><\/h4>\n

            Dr. Chien-Chung John Li
            \n\uff08Former Director of CECI Engineering Consultants, Inc., Former Associate Director of Public Construction Commission, Former Dean of School of Engineering, National Central University\uff09<\/p>\n

            Committee<\/strong><\/h4>\n

            Director of committee recommend or select committee depend on professional skills required on the particular accreditation.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”Fees Rate” tab_id=”1743034324444-20dd48ee-aa93″][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n

            I.Construction Technology Accreditation<\/strong><\/h4>\n

            1.Basic type: Cases which only relate to only one field and with simple legal relationship. Charges: from 300 thousand TWD
            \n2.Compound type: Cases which relate to more than two professional field. Charges: From 600 thousand TWD.
            \n3.Integrate type: Cases which relate to more than two professional field-construction interface and legal relationship are complicated. Charges: From 1 million TWD.
            \n4.Combine type: Cases which relate to large scale construction and development project, MRT project, engineering dispute cases that cross border and cross stage. Charges: From 2 million.
            \nDetailed cot depend on disputed amount, necessity of field survey, evidence is complete or not, number of interested parties involved, amount of work on analysis and actuarial, amount if dispute point etc.<\/p>\n

            II. Profession Opinion<\/strong><\/h4>\n

            Same as construction technology accreditation.<\/p>\n

            III. Consultancy<\/strong><\/h4>\n

            Depend on professional needs to select the consultant. Fees rate is depend on qualifications. Charges: From 6000 TWD per hour.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][vc_tta_section title=”Summary of Appraisal Case Records” tab_id=”1743034680451-7d8735bd-343d”][vc_column_text]<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
            Court<\/td>\nCase Title<\/td>\nRemarks<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            High Court<\/td>\nTaiwan High Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Construction Co., Ltd. vs. OOOO \u2013 Payment for Construction Work<\/td>\nPayment for Construction Work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            High Court<\/td>\nTaiwan High Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Engineering Co., Ltd. vs. OOOO \u2013 Payment for Construction Work<\/td>\nPayment for Construction Work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            High Court<\/td>\nTaiwan High Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Construction Co., Ltd. vs. OOOO \u2013 Payment for Construction Work<\/td>\nPayment for Construction Work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Taichung Branch, High Court<\/td>\nTaiwan High Court Taichung Branch OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Co., Ltd. vs. OOOO \u2013 Damage Compensation<\/td>\nDamage Compensation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Taichung High Administrative Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Taichung High Administrative Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO vs. OOOO \u2013 Payment for Construction Work<\/td>\nPayment for Construction Work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Keelung District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Keelung District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Construction Co., Ltd. vs. OOOO Co., Ltd. \u2013 Payment for Price, etc.<\/td>\nPayment for Price<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Keelung District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Keelung District Court OO Year OO Case No. Payment of Fine Case<\/td>\nPayment of Fine<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Taipei District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Taipei District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO and OOOO vs. OOOO \u2013 Payment for Service Fees<\/td>\nPayment for Service Fees<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Taipei District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Taipei District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Co., Ltd. vs. OOOO \u2013 Refund of Funds<\/td>\nRefund of Funds<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Taipei District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Taipei District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Construction Co., Ltd. vs. OOOO Engineering Co., Ltd. \u2013 Payment for Construction Work<\/td>\nPayment for Construction Work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Taipei District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Taipei District Court OO Year OO Construction Case No. OOOO Construction Co., Ltd. vs. OOOO \u2013 Payment for Construction Work<\/td>\nPayment for Construction Work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Taipei District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Taipei District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Co., Ltd. vs. OOOO Co., Ltd. \u2013 Payment for Construction Work<\/td>\nPayment for Construction Work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Taipei District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Taipei District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Co., Ltd. vs. OOOO Co., Ltd. \u2013 Payment for Construction Work<\/td>\nPayment for Construction Work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Taipei District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Taipei District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Ltd. vs. OOOO Co., Ltd. \u2013 Payment for Construction Work<\/td>\nPayment for Construction Work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Taipei District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Taipei District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Ltd. vs. OOOO Co., Ltd. \u2013 Payment for Construction Work<\/td>\nPayment for Construction Work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Shilin District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Shilin District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO vs. OOOO \u2013 Payment for Construction Work<\/td>\nPayment for Construction Work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            New Taipei District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan New Taipei District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO vs. OOOO Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. \u2013 Damage Compensation<\/td>\nDamage Compensation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Taichung District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Taichung District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Engineering Co., Ltd. vs. OOOO \u2013 Payment for Construction Work<\/td>\nPayment for Construction Work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Taichung District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Taichung District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Co., Ltd. vs. OOOO Co., Ltd. \u2013 Request for Payment of Price<\/td>\nRequest for Payment of Price<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Changhua District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Changhua District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Co., Ltd. vs. OOOO Co., Ltd. \u2013 Refund of Purchase Price, etc.<\/td>\nRefund of Purchase Price, etc.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Changhua District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Changhua District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Co., Ltd. vs. OOOO \u2013 Payment for Construction Work<\/td>\nPayment for Construction Work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Tainan District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Tainan District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Co., Ltd. vs. OOOO Co., Ltd. \u2013 Evidence Preservation Case<\/td>\nEvidence Preservation Case<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Pingtung District Court<\/td>\nPingtung District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Ltd. vs. OOOO Co., Ltd. \u2013 Payment for Construction Work<\/td>\nPayment for Construction Work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Yilan District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Yilan District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Co., Ltd. vs. Defendant OOOO \u2013 Payment for Construction Work<\/td>\nPayment for Construction Work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Yilan District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Yilan District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Co., Ltd. vs. OOOO \u2013 Payment for Construction Work<\/td>\nPayment for Construction Work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Yilan District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Yilan District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Co., Ltd. vs. OOOO \u2013 Supplementary Appraisal on Payment for Construction Work<\/td>\nSupplementary Appraisal<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
            Yilan District Court<\/td>\nTaiwan Yilan District Court OO Year OO Case No. OOOO Co., Ltd. vs. OOOO \u2013 Payment for Construction Work<\/td>\nPayment for Construction Work<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

            [\/vc_column_text][\/vc_tta_section][\/vc_tta_accordion][vc_column_text css=””]<\/p>\n

            Tamkang University Construction Law Research and Development Centre (Project Management and Construction Technology Accreditation)<\/h3>\n

            No. 5, Lane 199, Jinhua Street, Da\u2019an District, Taipei City, Taiwan 100
            \n*National Judicial Yuan\u2019s accreditation agent<\/p>\n

            Construction Technology Accreditation Committee Director\uff1a<\/strong>
            \nFormal Director of CECI Engineering Consultants, Inc.
            \nFormer Associate Director of Public Construction Commission
            \nFormal Dean of Engineering of National Central University
            \nDr. Chien-Chung John Li<\/p>\n

            Construction Law Consultancy Committee Director:<\/strong>
            \nDean of School of Law of National Chengchi University, Dr. Hwang Li
            \nDirector\uff1a<\/strong>
            \nAssociate Professor of Tamkang University, Dr. Fan SuLing<\/p>\n

            Services:<\/h4>\n

            Our services include construction technical appraisal, expert reporting, and construction law consulting.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][vc_column width=”1\/4″][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1746412743202{margin-top: 40px !important;}”][vc_column width=”1\/4″][\/vc_column][vc_column width=”1\/2″][vc_column_text css=””]<\/p>\n

            Congratulations to Director Fan Su-Ling for Receiving the NTU Outstanding Civil Engineering Alumni Award<\/h4>\n

            [\/vc_column_text][vc_column_text css=””]\"\"[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][vc_column width=”1\/4″][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

            [vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text css=””][\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row css=”.vc_custom_1746503120326{margin-top: 40px !important;}”][vc_column width=”1\/4″][vc_single_image image=”7433″ img_size=”200×200″ alignment=”center” style=”vc_box_circle” […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"pmpro_default_level":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3287","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","pmpro-has-access"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionlaw.tku.edu.tw\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3287","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionlaw.tku.edu.tw\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionlaw.tku.edu.tw\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionlaw.tku.edu.tw\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionlaw.tku.edu.tw\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3287"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionlaw.tku.edu.tw\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3287\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7438,"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionlaw.tku.edu.tw\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3287\/revisions\/7438"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionlaw.tku.edu.tw\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3287"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}